Cramer: "Cut Apple Some Slack"
4 mensagens
|Página 1 de 1
Já foi há uns tempos largos, Paulo. A acção continua bullish em todos os horizonte temporais e apenas mudaria de poisção, em termos de curto prazo, com uma quebra da zona de suporte entre os 322 e os 327 dólares. Em termos de médio prazo, o grande sinal de perigo ocorreria em caso de quebra da zona de suporte entre os 270 e os 275 dólares.
Um abraço,
Ulisses
Um abraço,
Ulisses
-
- Administrador Fórum
- Mensagens: 31013
- Registado: 29/10/2002 4:04
- Localização: Aveiro
Bom artigo Ulisses.
Não deixa de ser curiosa a percepção de 'risco' que as pessoas têm em relação à cotação alta da AAPL, quando a ATR(14 dias) mostra exactamente o contrário.
Se repararmos nos meses em que a cotação foi de 100$ a 200$ (Março a Dezembro de 2009), a ATR esteve sempre aproximadamente em 4$, ou seja a ATR passou de 4% para 2.5% da cotação.
Hoje a cotação está nos 358$ e a ATR nos 6.5$ o que representa 1.8%.
Do ponto de vista de 'oscilações' a Apple é mais 'segura' hoje do que quando andava nos 100$. E no entanto a percepção é ao contrário.
Não deixa de ser curiosa a percepção de 'risco' que as pessoas têm em relação à cotação alta da AAPL, quando a ATR(14 dias) mostra exactamente o contrário.
Se repararmos nos meses em que a cotação foi de 100$ a 200$ (Março a Dezembro de 2009), a ATR esteve sempre aproximadamente em 4$, ou seja a ATR passou de 4% para 2.5% da cotação.
Hoje a cotação está nos 358$ e a ATR nos 6.5$ o que representa 1.8%.
Do ponto de vista de 'oscilações' a Apple é mais 'segura' hoje do que quando andava nos 100$. E no entanto a percepção é ao contrário.
- Anexos
-
- aapl.png (19.11 KiB) Visualizado 746 vezes
No man is rich enough to buy back his past - Oscar Wilde
-
- Mensagens: 9360
- Registado: 4/6/2010 12:12
- Localização: 16
Cramer: "Cut Apple Some Slack"
"Cut Apple Some Slack"
By Jim Cramer
RealMoney Columnist
3/3/2011 7:01 AM EST
"The caller was angry. He wanted to know how Apple (AAPL - commentary - Trade Now) could sit on that $60 billion cash war chest and not return that to shareholders. He wanted to know why Apple hasn't split the stock. He wanted to know why these injustices occur.
I thought about it for a moment, knowing that I favored dividends and returning capital to the shareholders. I don't have much of a love for splits, but I know --rightly or wrongly -- that such an event would attract a lot of new buyers to the stock.
But then I just let loose. When you perform as well as Apple does; when you invent a whole new ecosystem; when you are the world's best engineering, designing, manufacturing and retailing name; when you have changed as many games as they have and when you have made as much money for shareholders as they have, then you know what? You don't have to play by the rules that others do.
I think Apple can sit with that cash as long as it pleases. (And can you imagine what this company will earn when the Fed starts raising rates?) I have told people over and over again that if the high dollar amount of the stock is intimidating or you can't get enough bang for the Apple buck, the business allows you to purchase deep-in-the-money calls (something I spend 100 pages on in Getting Back to Even) to "create" a lower price for Apple with less risk because you can stop your downside with a shallower strike.
But all of this reminds me that Apple, by virtue of its success -- most companies would kill to have a stock trajectory and a product lineup and a balance sheet that Apple has -- gets more than its fair share of attention. Just think about how many people in the press debate whether Apple is being "outrageous" in its non-delineation of Steve Jobs' successors. Or how much heat it took for the "bad" iPhone antenna.
Slack is an odd thing in this business. Whenever you cut it for a company or your own rules that are meant to protect yourself, you tend to get hurt. But I think the exception must be made here. Apple, when you back out the cash, sells for about a market multiple. Having devoured as many inches as possible of cyber-ink about the iPad 2, I think the product leaps ahead of all others. The iPhone rollout is steady for Verizon. The Macs are selling terrifically. The expansion continues.
I say, let them burn the cash for all I care. This company's stock is a winner, with or without a dividend, with or without a split and with or without Steve Jobs, because it is the best-run company with the best-run products built within an ecosystem of 200 million users that is growing faster than just about any enterprise I follow.
If it sold for 30x earnings, I would be more worried. But it sells for 15x earnings. Stop griping. Start buying.
At the time of publication, Cramer was long Apple. "
By Jim Cramer
RealMoney Columnist
3/3/2011 7:01 AM EST
"The caller was angry. He wanted to know how Apple (AAPL - commentary - Trade Now) could sit on that $60 billion cash war chest and not return that to shareholders. He wanted to know why Apple hasn't split the stock. He wanted to know why these injustices occur.
I thought about it for a moment, knowing that I favored dividends and returning capital to the shareholders. I don't have much of a love for splits, but I know --rightly or wrongly -- that such an event would attract a lot of new buyers to the stock.
But then I just let loose. When you perform as well as Apple does; when you invent a whole new ecosystem; when you are the world's best engineering, designing, manufacturing and retailing name; when you have changed as many games as they have and when you have made as much money for shareholders as they have, then you know what? You don't have to play by the rules that others do.
I think Apple can sit with that cash as long as it pleases. (And can you imagine what this company will earn when the Fed starts raising rates?) I have told people over and over again that if the high dollar amount of the stock is intimidating or you can't get enough bang for the Apple buck, the business allows you to purchase deep-in-the-money calls (something I spend 100 pages on in Getting Back to Even) to "create" a lower price for Apple with less risk because you can stop your downside with a shallower strike.
But all of this reminds me that Apple, by virtue of its success -- most companies would kill to have a stock trajectory and a product lineup and a balance sheet that Apple has -- gets more than its fair share of attention. Just think about how many people in the press debate whether Apple is being "outrageous" in its non-delineation of Steve Jobs' successors. Or how much heat it took for the "bad" iPhone antenna.
Slack is an odd thing in this business. Whenever you cut it for a company or your own rules that are meant to protect yourself, you tend to get hurt. But I think the exception must be made here. Apple, when you back out the cash, sells for about a market multiple. Having devoured as many inches as possible of cyber-ink about the iPad 2, I think the product leaps ahead of all others. The iPhone rollout is steady for Verizon. The Macs are selling terrifically. The expansion continues.
I say, let them burn the cash for all I care. This company's stock is a winner, with or without a dividend, with or without a split and with or without Steve Jobs, because it is the best-run company with the best-run products built within an ecosystem of 200 million users that is growing faster than just about any enterprise I follow.
If it sold for 30x earnings, I would be more worried. But it sells for 15x earnings. Stop griping. Start buying.
At the time of publication, Cramer was long Apple. "
-
- Administrador Fórum
- Mensagens: 31013
- Registado: 29/10/2002 4:04
- Localização: Aveiro
4 mensagens
|Página 1 de 1
Quem está ligado:
Utilizadores a ver este Fórum: cmsbarros, Google [Bot], malakas, Massao1, navaldoc, OCTAMA, rg7803, Shimazaki_2, trilhos2006 e 152 visitantes